Monthly Archives: June 2008
Liquid Church
Last week, I went with a friend to the local United Methodist Church. It was a fairly traditional church without a lot of bells or whistles. I was a little confused by the children’s sermon on fair-trade coffee, but I won’t go there. So today, four of us hopped on a train to Morristown to visit Liquid Church, a really creative congregation that has their worship service in the Morristown Hyatt. We got there a little early and had a chance to spend a few minutes talking with Pastor Tim Lucas. It was nice to meet him and have him spend a few minutes in conversation.
The service had about 15 minutes of music by their really amazing band, 10 minutes of an infant dedication portion (which had remarkably similar language to our liturgy), a 30 minute sermon (interestingly, a sermon of Craig Groeschel’s piped in for this week), and about 5 to 10 minutes of announcements and offering (done simultaneously).
More than anything, I felt the stark contrast between the two churches. Liquid creatively uses public space and the blend between those in worship and the active hotel lobby was very cool. Imagine about 250 worshippers hanging in the lobby of a Hyatt Regency. There was a sense of expectancy in the worship experience, and people seemed to intently pay attention to the message (at Liquid, that is). I tried to imagine myself entering as a non or nominal Christian. From that perspective, I would have certainly visited Liquid again.
I find myself torn in many ways between the two ways of doing ministry. I value the sacramental side of our tradition and the very real means of grace that we experience, yet I also sometimes wish we had more experiential worship and messages like I heard today. If we could somehow blend the two, we’d be far better off. It seems to me that we (not all of us, but some of us) aren’t nearly as intentional as Liquid about expecting visitors who have a spiritual hunger and thirst. I know I’m just seeing the worship setting, but isn’t that what most folks encounter on their first visit to our congregations?
All in all, I want more. I expect more out of us as a denomination. Can we be brave enough to start a church that meets in a hotel? Can we create creative and cutting-edge ministries that also carry the richness of our spiritual and sacramental tradition? I really want to know.
Brueggemann’s Prophetic Imagination
I haven’t written much on the blog lately, so I thought I’d include a review I did for school on Walter Brueggemann’s, The Prophetic Imagination. So, here ya go:
“I can’t explain, you would not understand. This is not how I am. I have become comfortably numb.
Comfortably Numb, by Pink Floyd.
These words by Pink Floyd provide a deep insight into the cultural milieu to which Walter Brueggemann speaks in his work, The Prophetic Imagination. In his own words, “the cultural situation in the United States, satiated by consumer goods and propelled by electronic technology, is one of narcotized insensibility to human reality.” Throughout the book, we find that Brueggemann’s powerful reflections on the world and work of the biblical prophets are more than a simple study of an ancient past. Instead, they are reflections which are relevant to the world in which we live, a world which Brueggemann believes is so enculturated to an ethos of consumerism that it has lost the ability to act.
In the opening chapter, the author examines the alternative community of Moses as a paradigm for the community built on the foundation of the biblical prophet’s work and ministry. Altogether, as Bruggemann proposes,
“The task of prophetic ministry is to nurture, nourish, and evoke a consciousness and perception alternative to the consciousness and perception of the dominant culture around us.”
This alternative community who lives in a different imaginative world is nurtured by the twofold work of the prophet to criticize the dominant consciousness and energize communities by a teleological promise toward which the community is encouraged to move. This is exemplified in the community of Israel in Egyptian exile. Moses’ mission and ministry as a prophet criticized the Egyptian empire and helped energize the Hebrew people to embody a new community based on the notion of the utter freedom of God. This community would stand in stark contrast to the static imperial religion of Egypt and encourage justice and compassion rather than the imperial preference for oppression.
The criticism embodied by Moses, and the prophet in general, isn’t mere carping or complaining. It is instead an authentic experience of grief at the troubling social paradigms being faced by the community under oppression by the imperial imagination. This prophetic criticism helped begin to mobilize the Hebrew community away from Egypt and toward a new alternative community. The prophet then helps this newly minted community become organized to move to the new reality of God. Using symbolic imagery, poetry, and even freeform dance, the prophet helps people learn to trust in the new reality that is birthed. We can begin to see the possibility of living in a new way only when the old realities leave us hopeless or numb.
Although Moses helped criticize the empire and helped energize Israel to move to a new and preferred reality, the alternative community didn’t last forever. In chapter two, Brueggemann discusses the “royal consciousness,” which makes an appearance under the Davidic dynasty and then reaches its pinnacle under Solomon’s leadership. Solomon’s reign tended toward self-serving leadership with the primary hope of securing his own reign. Unfortunately, sustained taxation, syncretism, conscription, and excessive beauracracy were the fruits of Solomonic labor! In many ways, this new approach was simply a Hebraic version of the Egyptian empire. As Brueggemann writes, with a significant tip-of-the-hat to modern America, “It is difficult to keep a revolution of freedom and justice under way when there is satiation.” Within this kind of regime, God’s freedom is limited. Instead of an utterly free God, we find that empire seeks to present God as a soother of the royal consciousness, satiation, and aspirations. Altogether, this leads to the same “comfortably numb” feeling described in the opening section of this review.
Jeremiah’s ministry is then lifted up as a paradigm of radical criticism and the embrace of pathos. The ministry of grief over what was lost and what is missing becomes a crucial task for the would-be prophet. Brueggemann writes,
“The royal consciousness leads people to numbness, especially to numbness about death. It is the task of prophetic ministry and imagination to bring people to engage their experiences of suffering and death.”
Jeremiah takes up this task, in spite of his misgivings! He helps cut through the numbness by offering tangible symbols, bringing public expressions to the fear and terrors ignored in the royal consciousness, and speaking metaphorically, yet concretely, about the hovering specter of death. Again, this ministry embraces the reality of negativity and grieves over which future has been chosen in order to help people reach a place where they can be energized by the alternative imagination.
In the next chapter, we find the energizing enterprise of Jeremiah as he seeks to mine the stories of the people and give expression to the hope of God in their midst. Hope, then, becomes a subversive expectation that subverts the message of empire that “all is OK.”
Finally, we find two chapters on Jesus of Nazareth. Here Brueggemann explores the criticizing and energizing ministries of Jesus to be a strongly prophetic ministry. Although the historical and theological narrative of Jesus cannot be contained by this one category, we certainly can see how he lived out these callings. First, he subverted all empires by announcing the ultimate alternative consciousness, the Kingdom of God. He also offered the ultimate critique of the royal consciousness as he embraced a death sentence, a passionate man in the midst of numbed Jerusalem, passionately penetrating the numbness through this vocational embrace of grief and sorrow. In fact,
“The cross is the ultimate metaphor of prophetic criticism because it means the death of the old consciousness that brings death on everyone. The crucifixion articulates God’s odd freedom, his strange justice, and his peculiar power. It is this freedom (read religion of God’s freedom), justice (read economics of sharing), and power (read politics of justice) that break the power of the old age and bring it to death.”
The cross is the ultimate critique of the royal consciousness and clears the way for a newly imagined community.
The purpose of the new community is to enable a new human beginning. In Brueggemann’s words, “The resurrection of Jesus is the ultimate energizing for the new future…” The resurrection initiates a new future, a new community, a new way to imagine the world, and a new Kingdom ruled by Jesus rather than whatever Pharaoh or Caesar that happens to be in power at the time. Out of this model we are called to participate in this alternative consciousness and this newfound community. Any time the royal imperial consciousness starts to anesthetize us, God will use prophets. According to Brueggemann, this takes a particular practical shape:
1.) Prophetic ministry evokes an alternative community that knows it is about different things in different ways.
2.) The practice of prophetic ministry is not some special thing done two days a week.
3.) Prophetic ministry seeks to penetrate the numbness in order to face the body of death in which we get caught.
4.) Prophetic ministry penetrates despair so that new futures can be believed in and embraced.
Where are these communities today? How can we penetrate the numbness of our world symbolically and concretely? Only then will we be able to embrace the ultimate hope that God has in store in the future to which we are called.
Morning in Madison
This morning I’m sitting at Atlanta Bread Company in Madison, NJ eating a bagel, drinking some coffee, and thinking about my trip thus far. Even though we were told that everything was just a hop, skip, and a jump away from the school it’s about 12 minutes to this place and it’s the closest place to eat if you choose to skip the snack bar at Drew. It’s really not a problem, because I need the exercise!
My classes are both going strong. My first class, Exegesis of Job, meets from 9:30-12:30. Dr. Kenneth Ngwa is the professor for this course, which has been my favorite of the D.Min. program thus far. He’s a very sharp and curious professor, and I really value the way he manages the classroom environment. It’s opened my eyes to some really interesting issues in Job that I’ve never considered before, especially regarding the topic of theodicy. I appreciate that he uses a “post” historico-critical approach, even though he certainly is familiar with the best in that world of scholarship.
My other class is a methods and research course, which meets from 1:30-4:30 and has been pretty boring so far. I expected as much, but I enjoy spending this class with the Oklahoma cohort. After we meet for that, we usually do something to eat and get back to the dorms (yes, they told us townhouses – yes, I guess they are – dorm is still a better description) to read until bedtime. Just about every night is taken with reading for the following day. We do have chapel each morning, but I missed yesterday to go work out in the gym. Today we go for matriculation, where we sign our names to some big historic book of some kind.
So, anyway, that’s about it. This will be my life for the next two weeks!
Who Do You Love?
Monday is the first day of my summer intensive session at Drew University. So, tomorrow morning at 7AM I’ll be flying out of Tulsa for Madison, New Jersey. Since it’s quite a drive to be in Tulsa that early, we came up early to spend the day with the kids and stay the night at a hotel by the airport. We left early, ate at IHOP in Muskogee, went by the “Build-a-Bear” Work$hop for the first time, ate a great lunch, and now we’re in our hotel room after a long swim in the pool. It’s been an awesome day with the people I love.
I just plugged into the free internet connection (cheers to Hilton, jeers to Doubletree Downtown where we stayed for Annual Conference) and checked my Google reader where I came across a really great post.
During college, I worked in a grocery store, where we would work for hours “facing” or “fronting” the store, pulling all the cans and boxes to the front. It was one of my favorite tasks, because It made the store look awesome. Then the people came to shop. Within minutes, the beautiful shelves were destroyed! We always said how great the grocery business would be without the customers…
Brant Hansen, over at Letters from Kamp Krusty, has an incredible post on times when this same mindset infiltrates ministry. Take the time to read his entire post; it’s a powerful reminder of how we’re called to love people who are hard to love and not just those who are easy to love, like our families. See, this post really did have some cohesion!
Evangelism after Christendom
If you only read one book on evangelism this year, it needs to be Evangelism after Christendom: The Theology and Practice of Christian Witness by Bryan Stone. I continue to have moments where I’m reading and something clicks that I’ve observed in the Church but never quite had the words to describe. I’m sure some of you will disagree with some of the premises. Nevertheless, if you want to really think critically and theologically about evangelism in the years ahead (and I think you should), you’ll want to have a conversation with Bryan Stone.
Here’s the last major quote that gave me pause:
What inevitably takes place in the practice of evangelism within a Constantinian social imagination is that the question of following Jesus as Lord is abstracted from the concrete loyalties, habits, and patterns of conduct associated with Jesus and the apostolic life. That question is instead transformed into a question of one’s nominal membership in a religious group. It may also be transformed into a question of one’s intellectual assent to propositions about who Jesus is or, as we see increasingly within the predominant consensus in modernity, into a private, inward, and dematerialized experience of Jesus’ lordship. The common denominator in all these transformations is that the sovereignty of Constantine remains intact while Christian witness is disassociated from the intrinsically material and political dimensions of the lordship of Jesus.
Check it out, you’ll be challenged and informed!
From Chreaster to Preacher
Jason Byassee is quickly becoming one of my favorite writers over at The Christian Century. I just stumbled across this blog post, and I think you might find it interesting. It’s Amazing how an observation from the original Greek of the New Testament has stayed in his mind years after hearing it in a sermon. This reminds me, and I hope it reminds you, to speak with great care when we stand to preach each Sunday.
Post-Ordination Post
Last Wednesday night’s ordination service was an event I’ll always remember, even though I think I’ll spend a lot more time processing exactly what happened there. Fortunately, I can go online and watch the service if I forget anything!
On Sunday, I wore my stole for the first time. It felt good after having held off for three years during my probationary (yes, yes provisional) period to wear it. I know that everyone feels differently about this, but for me it was a tangible sign of my new identity as an Elder in Full Connection. Strangely enough, I do feel a little different after the whole experience of ordination, even though I can’t quite explain it.
Other than my ordination, Annual Conference was pretty typical this year: hours of reports and lots of coffee with friends. The only other new experience was seeing the beginning of a new quadrennium. There was a little bit of political intrigue as the Board of Ordained Ministry is electing a new Chair person. As for me, I serve on two different committees. I’ve been on the Mission and Service Ministry Team since 2006, and now I’ll be serving as Vice-Chair of that committee. I’m also on the Young Adult Council, most likely because I’m 31.
It feels strange not to think about anything related to preparing for ordination. After all, this has been an important focus for nearly eight years of my life. However, now I’ll be shifting to focus more on my D.Min. I’ll be flying out to Madison, NJ in a couple of weeks to begin the on-campus portion of the degree. I’ll be taking a methods course, an exegesis course on Job, and a course on prophetic leadership. I’m looking forward to the extended time for study, but I’m not looking forward to being away from my wife and kids.
Well, I think that’s it for now. I’ve been reading a terrific book I read at AC called Evangelism after Christendom by Bryan Stone, and his discussion of evangelism as a MacIntyrian “practice,” has me really giving some thought to our conference’s new “strategic plan.” It seems to me that the distinction between goods internal and external to a practice could really help us think more clearly about what we’re doing and why. Maybe I’ll throw a post up on that in a couple of days. Until then, grace & peace!




